Despite a divided Republican
majority, the House of Representatives late Tuesday easily approved
emergency bipartisan legislation sparing all but a sliver of America’s
richest from sharp income tax hikes -- while setting up another “fiscal
cliff” confrontation in a matter of weeks.
Lawmakers voted 257-167 to send
the compromise to President Barack Obama to sign into law. Eighty-five
Republicans and 172 Democrats backed the bill, which had sailed through
the Senate by a lopsided 89-8 margin shortly after 2 a.m. Opposition
comprised 151 Republicans and 16 Democrats.
Republican House Speaker John
Boehner voted in favor of the deal, as did House Budget Committee
Chairman Paul Ryan, his party's failed vice presidential candidate. But
Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Majority Whip Kevin
McCarthy voted against it.
As debate began, Republican House
Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp heralded “a legacy vote” that
amounted to a victory for his party because Democrats agreed to make
permanent the tax cuts his party enacted in 2001 and 2003. Camp called
the bill a step towards reforming the country’s “nightmare” tax code and
described it as the largest tax cut in history.
Representative Sander Levin, the
top Democrat on Camp’s committee, claimed victory because the vote
shattered “the iron barrier” Republicans maintained for 20 years against
raising taxes.
It fell to Democratic
Representative Charlie Rangel to admit “this is no profile in courage
for me to be voting for this bill” because “we created this monster.”
The polarized House approved the
measure, unchanged, after House Republican leaders beat back a day-long
insurrection within their ranks fueled by conservative anger at the
bill’s lack of spending cuts. A final vote was expected late Tuesday
evening.
“They’re crazy, but they’re not
that batshit crazy,” Democratic Representative Alcee Hastings told
reporters as the Republican plan came into focus.
Hastings’s blunt assessment came
after a day in which Republican leaders at times seemed to be as much
political arsonists as firefighters in the face of rank-and-file GOP
anger at the bill.
The House seemed on track to
torch the legislation, a hard-fought bipartisan bill crafted by Vice
President Joe Biden and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell that
sailed through the Senate by a lopsided 89-8 margin in a vote shortly
after 2 a.m.
The compromise bill averts the
sharpest tax increase in American history. But it hikes rates on income
above $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for households, while
exemptions and deductions the wealthiest Americans use to reduce their
tax bill face new limits. The accord also raises the taxes paid on large
inheritances from 35% to 40% for estates over $5 million. And it
extends by one year unemployment benefits for some two million
Americans. It also prevents cuts in payments to doctors who treat
Medicare patients and spares tens of millions of Americans who otherwise
would have been hit with the Alternative Minimum Tax. And it extends
some stimulus-era tax breaks championed by progressives.
The middle class will still see
its taxes go up: The final deal did not include an extension of the
payroll tax holiday. A report released by the non-partisan Congressional
Budget Office Tuesday complicated matters further. It said that the
Senate-passed compromise would add nearly $4 trillion to the federal
deficit over 10 years.
Despite the overwhelming Senate
vote, the accord landed with a thud in the House, where Cantor surprised
lawmakers by coming out flatly against the deal during a morning
closed-door meeting of House Republicans. Cantor’s announcement fueled
conservative anger at the absence of spending cuts in a measure that had
originally been considered a likely vehicle for at least some
deficit-reduction. The results fed fears that the legislation was
doomed.
Republican leadership aides
played down the drama by insisting that “the lack of spending cuts in
the Senate bill was a universal concern amongst members in today’s
meeting.”
After grappling with the
insurrection all day, Republican leaders gave their fractious caucus a
choice during an emergency 5:15 p.m. meeting: Try to amend it or go for a
straight up-or-down vote on the original deal.
Cantor and Boehner “cautioned members about the risk in such a strategy,” according to a GOP leadership aide.House Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier, emerging from the gathering, bluntly told reporters “it’s pretty obvious” that amending the legislation and sending it back to the Senate would kill it. Democrats and Republicans in the upper chamber had signaled that lawmakers there would not take up a modified version of what was already a difficult deal.
The resulting pressure on GOP
leaders was immense: Absent action to avert the fiscal cliff, Americans
would face hefty across-the-board income-tax hikes, while indiscriminate
spending cuts risked devastating domestic and defense programs.
Skittish financial markets were watching the dysfunction in Washington
carefully amid warnings that going off the so-called cliff could plunge
the fragile economy into a new recession.
Defeat would have handed Boehner a
fresh embarrassment by blocking a measure he explicitly asked the
Senate and White House to negotiate without him but vowed to act on if
Republicans and Democrats could reach a deal. Public opinion polls had
shown that Republicans would have borne the brunt of the blame for
fiscal cliff-related economic pain.
Republicans also fretted about
the message if final passage came on the back of a majority of
Democratic votes, a tricky thing for Boehner two days before he faces
reelection as speaker. (In the hours before the vote, conservative
lawmakers played down the risks of a rebellion against the Ohio
lawmaker).
Time ran short for another
reason: A new Congress will take office at noon on Thursday, forcing
efforts to craft a compromise by the current Congress back to the
drawing board.
Efforts to modify the first
installment of $1.2 trillion in cuts to domestic and defense programs
over 10 years -- the other portion of the “fiscal cliff,” known as
sequestration -- had proved a sticking point late in the game. Democrats
had sought a year-long freeze but ultimately caved to Republican
pressure and signed on to just a two-month delay while broader
deficit-reduction talks continue.
That would put the next major battle over spending cuts right around
the time that the White House and its Republican foes are battling it
out over whether to raise the country's debt limit.
Republicans have vowed to push
for more spending cuts, equivalent to the amount of new borrowing. Obama
has vowed not to negotiate as he did in 2011, when a bruising fight
threatened the first-ever default on America's obligations and resulted
in the first-ever downgrade of the country's credit rating. Biden sent
that message to Democrats in Congress, two senators said.
As House Republicans raged at the
bill, key House Democrats emerging from a closed-door meeting with
Biden expressed support for the compromise and pressed Boehner for a
vote on the legislation as written.
“Our Speaker has said when the
Senate acts, we will have a vote in the House. That is what he said,
that is what we expect, that is what the American people deserve…a
straight up-or-down vote,” Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi
told reporters.
Conservative activist organizations like the anti-tax Club for Growth
warned lawmakers to oppose the compromise. The Club charged in a
message to Congress that “this bill raises taxes immediately with the
promise of cutting spending later.”President Barack Obama had previously declared that “this agreement is the right thing to do for our country and the House should pass it without delay.”
There were signs that the 2016
presidential race shaped the outcome in the Senate. Republican Senator
Marco Rubio, widely thought to have his eye on his party’s nomination,
voted no. Republican Senator Rand Paul, who could take up the
libertarian mantle of his father Ron Paul, did as well.
In a sign of deep GOP unease over
the legislation, Republican leaders Boehner, Cantor, and McCarthy did
not speak during the debate. Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi, Steny
Hoyer, and James Clyburn all did.
Biden's visit -- his second to
Congressional Democrats in two days -- aimed to soothe concerns about
the bill and about the coming battles on deficit reduction.
“This is a simple case of trying
to Make sure that the perfect does not become the enemy of the good,”
said Democratic Representative Elijah Cummings, one of the chamber’s
most steadfast liberals. “Nobody’s going to like everything about it.”
Asked whether House progressives,
who had hoped for a lower income threshold, would back the bill,
Cummings said he could not predict but stressed: “I am one of the most
progressive members, and I will vote for it.”
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento